Cognitive dissonance is evident in the voting patterns of some Catholics in the United States.  Many Catholics support political candidates or parties whose platforms contradict the core teachings of the Catholic Church, creating tension between their faith and their political choices.  Since 20% of the U.S. population is Catholic, it’s worth exploring how cognitive dissonance manifests among Catholic voters, the reasons behind their voting decisions, and the societal factors that exacerbate this conflict.

The Catholic Church maintains non-negotiable stances on certain moral issues: Abortion is considered a grave moral evil, homosexuality is viewed as disordered and unnatural, and transgenderism is seen as conflicting with natural law.  These teachings, outlined in documents like “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship,” emphasize the sanctity of life, marriage between a man and a woman, and gender aligned with biological sex.  Voting for candidates who openly support abortion, same-sex “marriage,” or transgenderism — such as prominent Catholic politicians like Nancy Pelosi, a recipient of the Margaret Sanger Award, or non-Catholic figures like Hillary Clinton, who also received the award — can create a moral dilemma for Catholic voters.  The Church explicitly states that supporting a pro-abortion politician constitutes “remote participation in a grave and intrinsic moral evil,” potentially a mortal sin if the vote is cast specifically to advance abortion.

Despite these teachings, many Catholics vote for candidates or parties, particularly Democrats, whose platforms conflict with Church doctrine.  Some justify their choices by prioritizing practical concerns like economic stability, health care, or immigration status.  Others cite family tradition, noting that they “have always voted Democrat,” or are swayed by journalists, celebrities, or social media advocating for progressive causes.  These justifications often lead to cognitive dissonance, manifesting as guilt, rationalization, or avoidance.  For example, some Catholics rationalize their votes by saying, “At least he’s not Trump” or minimize controversial issues with phrases like “Abortion is just one issue among many” or “Love is love” when defending same-sex “marriage.”

The U.S.’s binary political system complicates these decisions.  With only two major parties, Catholics may feel forced to choose candidates who partially align with their values.  A voter might prioritize social justice or poverty alleviation — issues aligned with Church teachings — over non-negotiable issues like abortion.  Alternatively, some Catholics separate their personal faith from political action, viewing voting as a pragmatic rather than a moral decision.  However, the Church’s stance is clear: Voting for candidates who consistently oppose non-negotiable teachings is morally problematic, especially when alternatives exist.

Secular culture and societal pressures further intensify cognitive dissonance.  Mainstream media, social media, and local communities often normalize practices like abortion and same-sex “marriage,” creating tension for Catholics striving to uphold Church teachings.  Older voters, in particular, may be influenced by traditional media outlets — television and newspapers — that lean heavily left and criticize conservative platforms.  This influence, described by some as “demoralization” or indoctrination (Bezmenov, 1984), can sway Catholics toward candidates misaligned with their faith.

When choosing between candidates, the decision may seem straightforward if one opposes abortion while the other supports it.  However, real-world scenarios are rarely so clear-cut.  If both candidates support abortion, or if one supports it while the other offers only passive opposition, Catholics must weigh additional issues, such as economic policies or social justice, to make an informed choice.  This complex decision-making process heightens cognitive dissonance, as voters grapple with aligning their conscience with practical outcomes.

Recent trends suggest a shift in Catholic voting behavior.  Over the past three U.S. general elections, many counties have recorded increasing Republican votes, reflecting growing dissatisfaction with the Democrat platform’s misalignment with Catholic values and its failure to address everyday concerns like economic stability.  Declining ratings for traditional media and growing reliance on digital sources, independent news, and social media indicate that voters are seeking alternative perspectives, potentially reducing the influence of left-leaning narratives.

Living in a pluralistic society presents challenges for Catholics striving to balance faith, conscience, and societal realities.  Voting decisions require careful discernment, weighing Church teachings against practical considerations.  By critically examining their choices, Catholics can navigate cognitive dissonance, striving to align their votes with both their faith and the broader social good.

Image via Pixabay.